Opinion
Argued May 25, 1892
Decided June 14, 1892
Howe Hummel for appellant.
Henry Thompson for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of FREEDMAN, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Duff v. Russell
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1892
31 N.E. 622 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Duff v. Russell
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1892
31 N.E. 622 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Duff v. Russell
Case Details
Full title:JAMES C. DUFF, Respondent, v . LILLIAN RUSSELL, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 14, 1892
Citations
31 N.E. 622 (N.Y. 1892)
133 N.Y. 678
45 N.Y. St. Rptr. 931
Citing Cases
Todd Protectograph Co. v. Hirschberg
Such a covenant ever since the case of Lumley v. Wagner, 1 De G., M. G. 604, has been frequently enforced.…
Stone Cleaning P. Union v. RussellIn the absence of any authorities directly in point, however, I think the cases most nearly applicable are…