From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dublin Division Michael Divito v. Wells

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia
Sep 8, 2009
CV 308-087 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 8, 2009)

Summary

awarding GCT credit only for time spent in federal custody, not the total sentence imposed

Summary of this case from Schleining v. Thomas

Opinion

CV 308-087.

September 8, 2009


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Petitioner's pending requests to supplement his petition with additional authority and for a "case status report" are MOOT (doc. nos. 11-1, 12), Harvey Lappin is DISMISSED as an improper party Respondent, the petition is DENIED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Respondent Wells.

SO ORDERED, at Augusta Georgia.


Summaries of

Dublin Division Michael Divito v. Wells

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia
Sep 8, 2009
CV 308-087 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 8, 2009)

awarding GCT credit only for time spent in federal custody, not the total sentence imposed

Summary of this case from Schleining v. Thomas
Case details for

Dublin Division Michael Divito v. Wells

Case Details

Full title:DUBLIN DIVISION MICHAEL DIVITO, Petitioner, v. WALT WELLS, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia

Date published: Sep 8, 2009

Citations

CV 308-087 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Schleining v. Thomas

See, e.g., Hickman v. United States, 2006 WL 20489, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2006) (holding that § 3624 "makes…

Schleining v. Thomas

ght of authority supports the BOP's interpretation of § 3624(b). Nearly every court that has addressed this…