From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 15, 1998
244 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1998)

Summary

finding lender under no duty to provide mortgagor with accurate appraisal in loan application, absent contractual language to contrary, where overvaluation of property led to larger mortgage

Summary of this case from Vaccaro v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Opinion

Decided April 15, 1998


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 52 (AC 16790), is denied.

Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition.

Matthew D. Gordon, in opposition.


Summaries of

Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 15, 1998
244 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1998)

finding lender under no duty to provide mortgagor with accurate appraisal in loan application, absent contractual language to contrary, where overvaluation of property led to larger mortgage

Summary of this case from Vaccaro v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Case details for

Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DUBINSKY v. CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 15, 1998

Citations

244 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1998)
714 A.2d 9

Citing Cases

Vaccaro v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

There is no automatic duty between a borrower and a lender. See e.g., Frigon v. Enfield Sav. & Loan Asso.,…

Forte v. Citicorp Mortgage

It contains no language indicating that Citicorp was to provide the plaintiffs with an appraisal on which…