From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dua v. Suffolk County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1983
96 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

September 19, 1983


Appeal by the Town of Huntington and Huntington Sewer Authority, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.), dated March 18, 1982, as granted petitioners' motion (1) for leave to serve a late notice of claim nunc pro tunc upon the Town of Huntington and the Huntington Sewer Authority and (2) to add the Town of Huntington and the Huntington Sewer Authority as additional parties in an action against Suffolk County and the Suffolk County Sewer Authority. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and petitioners' motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the Town of Huntington and the Huntington Sewer Authority and to add them as parties denied. Special Term was without jurisdiction to grant the application after the expiration of the applicable Statute of Limitations (see General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd 5; § 50-i, subd 1; Moore v City of New York, 84 A.D.2d 562, affd 56 N.Y.2d 950). It should be noted that although petitioners alleged that they were misled as to who was the owner of the sewer which malfunctioned and caused damage to their property, these allegations were directed solely toward the County of Suffolk. In response to these allegations, Special Term dismissed the third affirmative defense interposed by Suffolk County and Suffolk County Sewer Authority, viz., that "the County of Suffolk does not own, operate, maintain or control [the] sewer district serving plaintiffs' premises" and those defendants have not appealed from that part of Special Term's order. Mangano, J.P., O'Connor, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dua v. Suffolk County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1983
96 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Dua v. Suffolk County

Case Details

Full title:NARESH K. DUA et al., Respondents, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Walter v. City of New York

General Municipal Law § 50-e (1) (a) requires a notice of claim to be served within 90 days after the claim…

Simons v. Sherburne-Earlville Ctl. Sch. Dist

However, plaintiff did not move for leave to serve a late notice of claim until August 11, 1995, almost two…