Dreyfus v. Lutz Co.

Full title: EMANUEL DREYFUS, RESPONDENT, v. LUTZ COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 20, 1929

146 A. 913 (N.J. 1929)

146 A. 913

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1928 —

Decided May 20, 1929.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 608.

For the respondent, Mervin Herzfeld.

For the appellant, Kellogg Chance.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.