From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drew v. Westmoreland Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH
Feb 11, 2021
2:21-CV-00058-CRE (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-00058-CRE

02-11-2021

ANTOINE DREW and TYRIS L. DAVIS, Plaintiffs, v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, SEAN KERTES, CHAIRMAN; DOUGLASS W. CHEW, VICE-CHAIRMAN; GINA CERILLI, SECRETARY; UNKNOWN WARDEN, GEORGE LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SEC.; AND ERIC SCHWARTZ, DEPUTY WARDEN OF TREATMENT; Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiffs, Antoine Drew and Tyris L. Davis, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint in the above-titled action on January 12, 2021, raising civil rights violations at Westmoreland County Prison. Also on January 12, 2021, Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion for Class Certification, seeking to maintain this lawsuit as a class action on behalf of themselves and all practicing Muslims incarcerated/detained in Westmoreland County Prison ("WCP") and on behalf of all COVID-19 victims in WCP. (ECF No. 13).

Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that in order for a plaintiff to obtain class certification, four elements must be satisfied: (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interest of the class. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a).

Plaintiffs fail to satisfy at least one of these elements. It is well established that a prisoner proceeding pro se, is unable to satisfy the fourth element of a class action suit. See Awala v. New Jersey Dept. of Corrections, 227 F. App'x 33, 134 (3d Cir. 2007) (affirming the District Court where the "District Court dismissed Awala's complaint and amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b), concluding that as a pro se prisoner without formal training in the law . . . Awala would not be able to adequately represent the interests of the class and maintain the suit as a class action); Caputo v. Fauver, 800 F. Supp. 168, 170 (D.N.J. 1992), aff'd, 995 F.2d 216 (3d Cir. 1993) (table decision) (stating that "[e]very court that has considered the issue has held that a prisoner proceeding pro se is inadequate to represent the interests of his fellow inmates in a class action").

As explained above, Plaintiffs, prisoners proceeding pro se, cannot meet the fourth element to obtain class certification. Accordingly, this Motion will be denied.

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2021, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Class Certification is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

s/Cynthia Reed Eddy

Chief United States Magistrate Judge cc: ANTOINE DREW

354-2020

Westmoreland County Prison

3000 S. Grande Blvd.

Greensburg, PA 15601

(via U.S. First Class Mail)

TYRIS L. DAVIS

2737-2020

Westmoreland County Prison

3000 S. Grande Blvd.

Greensburg, PA 15601

(via U.S. First Class Mail)


Summaries of

Drew v. Westmoreland Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH
Feb 11, 2021
2:21-CV-00058-CRE (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Drew v. Westmoreland Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE DREW and TYRIS L. DAVIS, Plaintiffs, v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, SEAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH

Date published: Feb 11, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-00058-CRE (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2021)