From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drew ex Rel. Drew v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 17, 2000
231 F.3d 927 (4th Cir. 2000)

Summary

failing to reach consensus among active circuit judges on issue of whether notice of medical negligence puts the United States on notice of informed consent claim as well

Summary of this case from Rudisill v. United States

Opinion

No. 99-1009.

November 17, 2000.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This appeal having come on for oral argument before the en banc Court on October 31, 2000, pursuant to Order of September 8, 2000, by which the panel opinion of June 27, 2000, 217 F.3d 193, was vacated and en banc consideration was granted,

IT IS ORDERED, by virtue of an equally divided vote of the active members of the Court, that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Drew ex Rel. Drew v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 17, 2000
231 F.3d 927 (4th Cir. 2000)

failing to reach consensus among active circuit judges on issue of whether notice of medical negligence puts the United States on notice of informed consent claim as well

Summary of this case from Rudisill v. United States
Case details for

Drew ex Rel. Drew v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Sterling DREW, a minor under the age of thirteen years, by guardian ad…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 2000

Citations

231 F.3d 927 (4th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Cnty. of Wilson

According to the statute, exhaustion of administrative remedies is necessary before bringing a Federal Torts…

Wooding v. U.S.

Ad. News 2515, 2516. Though the Opinion was later vacated and a hearing en banc granted, I nevertheless find…