From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dresser v. Norms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 23, 2019
CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-426-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 23, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-426-DBH

01-23-2019

JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER, PLAINTIFF v. ROBERT A. NORMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 2, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff's Complaint. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. I hereby place Jay Parker Lunt Dresser on NOTICE that filing restrictions "may be in the offing." Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the "cautionary order" of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2019

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dresser v. Norms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 23, 2019
CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-426-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Dresser v. Norms

Case Details

Full title:JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER, PLAINTIFF v. ROBERT A. NORMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 23, 2019

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-426-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 23, 2019)

Citing Cases

Torres v. Zarchi

As this Court noted when it dismissed Torres' complaint for failure to prosecute the action, parties to…

McFadden v. Burke

McFadden is advised that parties to litigation have a duty “to keep the court informed of their current…