From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Draughon v. Harnett Cty. Bd. of Educ

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 2004
358 N.C. 131 (N.C. 2004)

Opinion

No. 358A03

Filed 6 February 2004

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 158 N.C. App. 208, 580 S.E.2d 732 (2003), affirming an order for summary judgment entered 17 December 2001 by Judge Wiley F. Bowen in Superior Court, Harnett County. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 December 2003.

Keith A. Bishop, PLLC, by Keith A. Bishop, for plaintiff-appellant. Tharrington Smith, LLP, by Jonathan A. Blumberg and Lisa Lukasik, for all defendant-appellees; Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, LLP, by Patricia L. Holland, for defendant-appellees Honeycutt, Ausley, and McCall; and Bailey Dixon, LLP, by Gary Parsons and Warren Savage, for defendant-appellees Honeycutt, Ausley, McCall, Spell, and Wilson.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Draughon v. Harnett Cty. Bd. of Educ

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 2004
358 N.C. 131 (N.C. 2004)
Case details for

Draughon v. Harnett Cty. Bd. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:LYNETTA DRAUGHON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MAX DRAUGHON…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 2004

Citations

358 N.C. 131 (N.C. 2004)
591 S.E.2d 521

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. Safran

Once the party seeking summary judgment makes the required showing, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party…

Turning Point Industries v. Global Furniture, Inc.

To hold otherwise ... would be to allow plaintiffs to rest on their pleadings, effectively neutralizing the…