From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Hess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1953
281 App. Div. 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

May 27, 1953.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted as to paragraph No. 1 of the demand, without costs. Memorandum: The defendants are entitled to know the names and addresses of the various persons who had previously been bitten as alleged in paragraphs third and fourth of the complaint in order to make preparation to meet such proof. (See Robson v. Driscoll, 278 App. Div. 847; 4 Carmody-Wait on New York Practice, § 18, p. 633.) All concur. (Appeal from part of an order denying a motion to require plaintiff to deliver to defendants a bill of particulars as set forth in the motion insofar as it denied demand for bill of particulars contained in paragraph 1.)


Summaries of

Drake v. Hess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1953
281 App. Div. 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Drake v. Hess

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE DRAKE, Respondent, v. ORVEN R. HESS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1953

Citations

281 App. Div. 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Diskin v. St. Martins Roman Catholic Church

Appellant is entitled to know the dates, places, names and addresses of various persons who had been…

Conley v. Long

In those cases it is held that the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars of the dates and places of…