From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drain v. Nicholson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 10, 2008
Case No. 1:07-cv-690 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-cv-690.

January 10, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed December 13, 2007 (Doc. 17).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss defendants Jeanette Criswell, Dorothy Dervin, Vynetta Barnett, and Patricia Mathis is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Drain v. Nicholson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 10, 2008
Case No. 1:07-cv-690 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Drain v. Nicholson

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy R. Drain, Plaintiff v. James Nicholson, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:07-cv-690 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Blackwell

"When considering a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), the Court must accept as true all factual…

Porter v. Sergent

"When considering a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), the Court must accept as true all factual…