From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. W.L. Douglas Shoe Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1904
92 App. Div. 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)

Opinion

March, 1904.


Interlocutory judgment modified by inserting provision therein allowing plaintiff costs of the demurrer as a condition for permitting defendant to answer, and as so modified affirmed, with costs of both appeals to the plaintiff, on the authority of Tallman v. Bernhard (75 Hun, 30) and Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Co. (79 id. 392; affd., 143 N.Y. 665). — All concurred.


Summaries of

Doyle v. W.L. Douglas Shoe Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1904
92 App. Div. 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)
Case details for

Doyle v. W.L. Douglas Shoe Company

Case Details

Full title:Margaret Doyle, Appellant, v. W.L. Douglas Shoe Company, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1904

Citations

92 App. Div. 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)

Citing Cases

Hackett v. Strumpf

It seems obvious that the learned court has been erroneously influenced by the line of authorities which hold…

de Turckheim v. Thomas

In Tallman v. Bernhard (75 Hun, 30; 31 Abb. N.C. 84) an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to the…