From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 15, 1998
719 A.2d 1163 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

Decided May 15, 1998


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 902 (AC 17006), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the tortfeasor's vehicle is not underinsured when the tortfeasor has a $100,000 liability policy and the plaintiff has a $100,000-$300,000 split limit uninsured motorist policy in circumstances where, due to the existence of multiple claimants, the plaintiff's recovery under the tortfeasor's policy is less than $100,000?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15939.

Bernard Pellegrino, in support of the petition.

Karen T. Gerber, in opposition.


Summaries of

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 15, 1998
719 A.2d 1163 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SEAN DOYLE v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 15, 1998

Citations

719 A.2d 1163 (Conn. 1998)
719 A.2d 1163

Citing Cases

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property Casualty Ins. Co.

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate…