From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. Clark

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Dec 7, 2009
CV 308-072 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2009)

Summary

concluding that plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies where the Commissioner did not respond to the appeal within 90-days as required by the standard operating procedure

Summary of this case from Wilkerson v. Bryson

Opinion

CV 308-072.

December 7, 2009


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 16) is GRANTED, judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Defendant, and this civil action is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doyle v. Clark

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Dec 7, 2009
CV 308-072 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2009)

concluding that plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies where the Commissioner did not respond to the appeal within 90-days as required by the standard operating procedure

Summary of this case from Wilkerson v. Bryson
Case details for

Doyle v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT NORMAN DOYLE, Plaintiff, v. PAT CLARK, Medical Director, H.S.A.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2009

Citations

CV 308-072 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilkerson v. Bryson

Moreover, if Plaintiff did file an appeal regarding his grievance, regardless of whether the Commissioner…