From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dows v. Johnson

U.S.
Jan 21, 1884
110 U.S. 223 (1884)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA.

Submitted January 7th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884.

Jurisdiction. When the value of the matter in dispute in this court is less than $5,000 the court is without jurisdiction of the cause, although an amount more than $5,000 may have been involved below. Hilton v. Dickinson, 108 U.S. 165, approved and followed.

Mr. Henry S. Monroe for plaintiffs in error and against the motion.

Mr. Samuel F. Chapman and Mr. W.F. Sapp for defendant in error and for the motion.


Motion to dismiss. Case also submitted on the briefs.


We have no jurisdiction in this case. The suit was brought by Dows Co. to recover damages for the unlawful conversion of ten thousand bushels of corn, the value of which, according to the findings, did not exceed $6,000. With interest added to this sum from the date of the alleged conversion until the judgment, the most that could have been recovered, upon the special finding, was $6,360. A judgment was in fact rendered for $2,430. The matter in dispute in this court is the difference between these two sums, or only $3,930. In Hilton v. Dickinson, 108 U.S. 165, it was settled that our jurisdiction depends on the value of the matter in dispute here, and as that in the present case is less than $5,000, it follows that the suit must be dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Dows v. Johnson

U.S.
Jan 21, 1884
110 U.S. 223 (1884)
Case details for

Dows v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:DOWS Another v . JOHNSON

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 21, 1884

Citations

110 U.S. 223 (1884)

Citing Cases

The Steamship Haverton

Assuming, as we must do, the total value to have been $6057, the matter in dispute in this court is the…

De La Torre v. National City Bank

Meanwhile over three years have gone by. "It is the amount in controversy at the time the appeal to this…