From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doumbia v. Moonlight Towing, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 19, 2018
160 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6320 Index 302911/14

04-19-2018

Oumar DOUMBIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. MOONLIGHT TOWING, INC., Defendant–Appellant, "John Doe," etc., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Picciano & Scahill, P.C., Bethpage (Andrea E. Ferrucci of counsel), for appellant. Bernstone & Grieco, LLP, New York (Peter B. Croly of counsel), for Oumar Doumbia, respondent. White Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Matthew I. Toker of counsel), for John Doe and USA Limousine Service Corp., respondents.


Picciano & Scahill, P.C., Bethpage (Andrea E. Ferrucci of counsel), for appellant.

Bernstone & Grieco, LLP, New York (Peter B. Croly of counsel), for Oumar Doumbia, respondent.

White Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Matthew I. Toker of counsel), for John Doe and USA Limousine Service Corp., respondents.

Friedman, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kapnick, Webber, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about May 8, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant Moonlight Towing, Inc. (Moonlight) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that he was injured when a vehicle owned by defendant USA Limousine Service Corp. (USA Limousine) came loose from a tow truck and rolled into his vehicle. Although Moonlight maintains that the subject tow truck was not its tow truck, USA Limousine's employee testified that after the vehicle he was driving broke down, a coworker provided him with contact information for Moonlight, which he called, and a tow truck that arrived and left with the vehicle said Moonlight on it. He also identified photographs of the tow truck. Such evidence presents clear credibility issues as to whether the tow truck involved belonged to Moonlight that cannot be resolved on this motion for summary judgment (see e.g. S.J. Capelin Assoc. v. Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 338, 341, 357 N.Y.S.2d 478, 313 N.E.2d 776 [1974] ; DeSario v. SL Green Mgt. LLC, 105 A.D.3d 421, 963 N.Y.S.2d 24 [1st Dept. 2013] ).


Summaries of

Doumbia v. Moonlight Towing, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 19, 2018
160 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Doumbia v. Moonlight Towing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Oumar Doumbia, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Moonlight Towing, Inc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 19, 2018

Citations

160 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 2739
71 N.Y.S.3d 884

Citing Cases

Maridakis v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (In re N.Y.C. Asbestos Litig.)

It is not the function of the Court deciding a summary judgment motion to make credibility determinations or…

Ombramonti v. Aluminum Co. of Am.

Lastly, it is not the function of the Court deciding a summary judgment motion to make credibility…