From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglass v. Newark Cheese Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, New York County
Apr 20, 1934
153 Misc. 718 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)

Opinion

April 20, 1934.

Frank, Weil Strouse, for the plaintiffs.

Charles H. Brown, for the defendant Newark Cheese Company, Inc.



Motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of insufficiency is denied. The action is to restrain unfair competition. Even in the absence of the possession of a technical trade-mark, acts by a defendant in dressing his merchandise in a manner which tends to palm off goods as those of another who has previously established in the public mind an association of that dress with his goods is the subject of an injunction. This is particularly true where actual deception of the buying public is set forth. ( Reckitt Sons v. Kellogg, 28 A.D. 111; Fischer v. Blank, 138 N.Y. 244.) The second motion on the ground of lack of jurisdiction is also denied. This court has full jurisdiction of an action for unfair competition, and the registration of the trademark in the United States Patent Office does not deprive it of jurisdiction. Order signed.


Summaries of

Douglass v. Newark Cheese Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, New York County
Apr 20, 1934
153 Misc. 718 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
Case details for

Douglass v. Newark Cheese Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD M. DOUGLASS and Another, Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Apr 20, 1934

Citations

153 Misc. 718 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
274 N.Y.S. 961

Citing Cases

Ramazzotti, S.P.A. v. Banfi Prods

It is the general appearance of the article, as noted by the ordinary purchaser, which is the test ( American…