From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
296 N.Y. 530 (N.Y. 1946)

Summary

In Douglas v. State of New York (296 N.Y. 530), it was held that officers of a State hospital, accepting a patient for treatment, were justified in regarding as valid an order of the Special Surrogate, regular on its face, without making inquiry as to the underlying authority of that judicial officer to make the order.

Summary of this case from People v. Briggs

Opinion

Submitted June 12, 1946

Decided July 23, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, GREENBERG, J.

Benedict S. Rosenfeld and Albert Jakobson for appellant.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( John R. Davison and Wendell P. Brown of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, without costs. The paper entered in the Court of Claims pursuant to the order of affirmance by the Appellate Division, although styled an "order," was in effect a judgment. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Douglas v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
296 N.Y. 530 (N.Y. 1946)

In Douglas v. State of New York (296 N.Y. 530), it was held that officers of a State hospital, accepting a patient for treatment, were justified in regarding as valid an order of the Special Surrogate, regular on its face, without making inquiry as to the underlying authority of that judicial officer to make the order.

Summary of this case from People v. Briggs
Case details for

Douglas v. State

Case Details

Full title:G. WELLINGTON DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 1946

Citations

296 N.Y. 530 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 605

Citing Cases

Guzy v. Guzy

The only allegation in the latter respect is that "Upon information and belief * * * at the time of the…

Wood v. State

The issue then became a jurisdictional one, rather than a case of medical judgment. The hospital cannot, on…