From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dortch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 5, 1996
668 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2679.

March 5, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Edward P. Nickinson III, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Richard Parker, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We have for review the sentence imposed on Michael Jerome Dortch (Dortch) using an incorrectly calculated scoresheet. The scoresheet included eighty-six points for two first-degree felony offenses for which Dortch was not convicted: sale of cocaine within 1000 yards of a school, and possession of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1000 yards of a school. The scoresheet error placed Dortch in a harsher sentencing guidelines range than the range permitted using a correctly calculated scoresheet; Dortch furthermore actually received a harsher sentence than that permitted using a correctly calculated scoresheet. This was error and the error was harmful. Hills v. State, 661 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing using a correctly calculated scoresheet. The judge, on resentencing, may impose any sentence he previously could have imposed on a correctly calculated scoresheet, that is, he may impose a departure sentence, so long as he provides written reasons for the departure. Id.

ERVIN, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dortch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 5, 1996
668 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Dortch v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JEROME DORTCH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 5, 1996

Citations

668 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Neal v. State

Neal thus was prejudiced by the error, and resentencing is required. Dortch v. State, 668 So.2d 1091 (Fla.…