From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorion v. Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 20, 1986
714 P.2d 174 (Nev. 1986)

Opinion

No. 16231

February 20, 1986

Appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Robert L. Schouweiler, J.

Warren W. Goedert, Reno, for Appellant.

Woodburn, Wedge, Blakey and Jeppson, Suellen Fulstone, for Respondent.


OPINION


This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of Bell Telephone Company of Nevada and against appellant Dorion, an industrial injury claimant claiming under a disability plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Dorion's claim for industrial compensation was denied by an Employees' Benefit Committee acting in accordance with Nevada Bell's employee disability benefits plan.

The only issue which we address relates to the availability of procedural safeguards on denial of compensation in benefits for employees of self-insured employers. This case arose in 1978 prior to the 1979 legislative enactment of procedures which adequately protected claimants of this kind. No such protections were in place in 1978. Justice and fairness require that these protections be applied retrospectively; therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand to the district court with instructions that the district court order that Dorion's entitlement to disability compensation be considered anew under the State Industrial Insurance Act in accordance with NRS 616.272. After a final determination has been made at the administrative level, judicial review may be exercised if appropriately requested by one of the parties.


Summaries of

Dorion v. Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 20, 1986
714 P.2d 174 (Nev. 1986)
Case details for

Dorion v. Bell Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:LORRAINE B. DORION, APPELLANT, v. BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF NEVADA…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Feb 20, 1986

Citations

714 P.2d 174 (Nev. 1986)
714 P.2d 174

Citing Cases

Gibson v. State

We conclude that it would violate fundamental principles of fairness and justice for appellant now to be…

AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Reid

In December of 1988, the NDA Appeals Officer determined that the NDA had jurisdiction to hear the matter…