From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooling v. Moore

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1862
20 Cal. 141 (Cal. 1862)

Opinion

         Rehearing granted, but without costs.

         Appeal from the County Court of Nevada.

         COUNSEL:

         John R. McConnell, for Appellant.

          George Cadwallader, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Cope, J. concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The judgment in this case was reversed on the argument. The respondent now moves for a rehearing, alleging that this Court never acquired jurisdiction of the case, the time to appeal having expired before the appeal was taken. Upon the examination of the record, we find the position correct. The appeal is from the judgment of the County Court, rendered on an appeal from a Justice's Court. The judgment was entered on the nineteenth of January, 1861, and the appeal was taken on the eighteenth of November following--more than ninety days afterwards. The statute limits the period within which an appeal may be taken " from a judgment rendered on an appeal from an inferior Court" to ninety days. (Prac. Act, sec. 336, as amended in 1859.) This Court, therefore, had no jurisdiction of the case, and could neither affirm nor reverse the judgment appealed from.

         When the appeal in this case was dismissed at the October term, it was without prejudice to a second appeal. (19 Cal. 18.) This reservation was not intended to give any right of which the statute had deprived the appellant. The Court could not enlarge the time for appealing. The reservation was only intended to prevent the dismissal from operating as a bar to a second appeal, if the time prescribed by statute had not expired.


Summaries of

Dooling v. Moore

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1862
20 Cal. 141 (Cal. 1862)
Case details for

Dooling v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:DOOLING v. MOORE

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1862

Citations

20 Cal. 141 (Cal. 1862)

Citing Cases

Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Gilleran

It is indeed said, in an old case, holding the affidavit of merits to be sufficient, that "the court below…

McKinley v. Tuttle

W. Crane, Jr., for Respondents, argued:          That the order appealed from was within the clear…