From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooley v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 23, 1942
25 A.2d 893 (N.J. 1942)

Opinion

Submitted February term, 1942.

Decided April 23d 1942.

On appeal from the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Michael M. Kane ( Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg, of counsel), for the complainant-appellee.

Messrs. Collins Corbin ( Mr. Edward A. Markley and Mr. Charles W. Broadhurst, of counsel), for the defendant-appellant Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. Mr. Amerigo D'Agostino ( Mr. Kenneth J. Dawes and Mr. Clarence M. Mulholland, of counsel), for the defendant-appellant Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, an unincorporated association.


The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Egan in his opinion reported in 130 N.J. Eq. 75.

In the opinion, however, the learned Vice-Chancellor discusses the question of the right of John J. Buckley, general chairman of the System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood and of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, c., itself to represent the clerks as bargaining agent with the employer Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. This question we do not consider necessary to the determination of the case and we consequently express no opinion thereon.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Dooley v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 23, 1942
25 A.2d 893 (N.J. 1942)
Case details for

Dooley v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK J. DOOLEY, complainant-appellee, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 23, 1942

Citations

25 A.2d 893 (N.J. 1942)
25 A.2d 893

Citing Cases

Owens v. Press Publishing Co.

ive contract agreed upon with the bargaining agent or by virtue of lawful negotiations with the individual…

Owens v. Press Publishing Co.

With this I am certain that both counsel agree. Dooley v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co., 130 N.J. Eq. 75 ( Ch.…