From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooley v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1964
22 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

November 2, 1964


In a libel action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 26, 1964, which granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiff, and motion to dismiss the complaint denied. Such denial, however, is with leave to renew the motion in the event that, within 90 days after entry of the order hereon, there has been a failure: (a) to effect a substitution of parties in place of the deceased individual defendant; (b) to complete all preliminary proceedings; and (c) to place the action on the calendar (see CPLR 1021). The pretrial examination of the defendant corporation, pursuant to the notice heretofore served by the plaintiff, shall proceed on 10 days' written notice or at such time and place as the parties may mutually agree by written stipulation. In the light of the legislative intent inherent in the recent amendment to the statute (CPLR 3216; L. 1964, ch. 974), the action should not be dismissed. In any event, by reason of the individual defendant's death, the court was not authorized to decide the motion until his executor or administrator had been substituted ( Ruderman v. Feffer, 10 A.D.2d 704; Wilson v. Harter, 57 App. Div. 484). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dooley v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1964
22 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Dooley v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN B. DOOLEY, Appellant, v. J. SPENCER GRAY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Wisdom v. Wisdom

That very lack of substitution imports a lack of jurisdiction to appeal. The question is not one of prejudice…

Waldron v. Ward

In our opinion, this defendant failed to demonstrate an unjustified delay in the prosecution of the action as…