From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donald v. Cotton States Tire Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 19, 1921
89 So. 296 (Ala. 1921)

Opinion

6 Div. 415.

May 19, 1921.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Romaine Boyd, Judge.

C. B. Powell and Luther Patrick, both of Birmingham, for appellants.

Counsel discuss the merits of the petition, and the want of jurisdiction of the trial court to render the judgment, but they do not discuss the point decided.

Clarence Mullins, of Birmingham, for appellee.

The appeal was not perfected in time and should be dismissed. Section 4866, Code 1907; 129 Ala. 599, 31 So. 31.


The petition was for writ of prohibition against plaintiff Cotton States Tire Rubber Company, Thomas Lea, as judge of the municipal court of Birmingham, and J. E. Matlock, as constable of precinct 12 in Jefferson county.

The judgment sustaining demurrer to the petition was rendered on November 13, 1920, and the appeal taken and perfected on March 25, 1921 — more than 30 days after the final judgment was rendered. Code, § 4866; Wells Amusement Co. v. Eros, 204 Ala. 239, 85 So. 692; Shackleford v. State, 204 Ala. 362, 85 So. 786; City of Birmingham v. Sou. Bell Tel. Co., 203 Ala. 251, 82 So. 519. The statute is mandatory. Lusk v. Capehart, 129 Ala. 599, 30 So. 31; State ex rel. Crow v. Crook, Judge, 123 Ala. 657, 27 So. 334; Ireland v. Brown, 6 Ala. App. 235, 60 So. 559. The court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal, nothing being presented for review. It follows that the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Donald v. Cotton States Tire Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 19, 1921
89 So. 296 (Ala. 1921)
Case details for

Donald v. Cotton States Tire Rubber Co.

Case Details

Full title:DONALD et al. v. COTTON STATES TIRE RUBBER CO

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 19, 1921

Citations

89 So. 296 (Ala. 1921)
206 Ala. 88

Citing Cases

State Tenure Com'n v. Anniston City Bd. of Educ

An appeal from the final judgment of the Circuit Court in a mandamus proceeding must be taken within 30 days.…

Dearborn Stove Company v. Dean

Appeals from such proceedings must be brought here as provided in Code 1940, T. 7, § 1074, within thirty days…