From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dolphin v. Starr

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 1942
130 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1942)

Opinion

No. 10135.

September 16, 1942.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington, Northern Division; John C. Bowen, Judge.

Action by Byron J. Dolphin, sometimes known as B.J. Dolphin and Dolphin's Natural Barks, against George E. Starr, United States Postmaster at Seattle, King County, Washington. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Edgar S. Hadley, of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

J. Charles Dennis, U.S. Atty., and Gerald Shucklin, and Tom A. Durham, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


The sole question presented to this court in this case, namely, whether the Postmaster General of the United States is an indispensable party to a suit of this nature, has been heretofore decided by this court, and the question is no longer open to dispute. We held, in Neher v. Harwood, Postmaster, etc., 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 846, 852, that the Postmaster General was an indispensable party in an action to enjoin a postmaster from carrying into effect a "fraud" order issued by the Postmaster General under 39 U.S.C.A. § 259.

Accordingly, the order of the court below is affirmed.


Summaries of

Dolphin v. Starr

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 1942
130 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1942)
Case details for

Dolphin v. Starr

Case Details

Full title:DOLPHIN v. STARR, Postmaster

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 16, 1942

Citations

130 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1942)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fanning

The Circuit Court of Appeals in the instant case followed its earlier decisions holding that the Postmaster…