From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 12, 2006
917 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D04-1854.

May 25, 2005. Rehearing Denied January 12, 2006.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, FLETCHER, and WELLS, JJ.


Affirmed. State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983, 987 (Fla. 1995) (permitting retro-active application of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), which held that the habitual offender statute did not authorize the imposition of consecutive habitual felony offender sentences for multiple crimes committed during a single criminal episode), receded from in part, Dixon v. State 730 So.2d 265, 269 n. 7 (Fla. 1999) (finding that "defendants must have already filed their 3.850 motion seeking Hale relief, at the very latest, within two years of the date our mandate in Callaway issued on August 16, 1995").


Summaries of

Doll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 12, 2006
917 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Doll v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio DOLL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 12, 2006

Citations

917 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)