From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dolfax v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division
Apr 13, 2010
No. 7:09-CV-67-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2010)

Opinion

No. 7:09-CV-67-FL.

April 13, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jones as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the M R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dolfax v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division
Apr 13, 2010
No. 7:09-CV-67-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Dolfax v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAVE E. DOLFAX, III, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

Citations

No. 7:09-CV-67-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2010)

Citing Cases

Schlarb v. Saul

See Tr. 40-47. "While it is not the province of this court to weigh the evidence considered by the ALJ, the…