From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dolce v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 2000
272 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

computing three-year period of limitations from time policy was issued

Summary of this case from Hoffmann v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Opinion

Submitted March 10, 2000.

May 15, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and misrepresentation in the replacement of an insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered May 14, 1999, as granted the respective motions of the defendants Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and Robert P. Flanagan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Bank, Sheer, Servino Seymour, White Plains, N.Y. (Daniel A. Seymour of counsel), for appellant.

Dewey Ballantine, LLP, New York, N.Y. (John F. Collins and John J. Blood of counsel), and D'Amato Lynch, New York, N.Y. (Kevin J. Windels of counsel), for respondents (one brief filed).

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff's claims that the defendants Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereinafter Northwestern) and Robert P. Flanagan failed to comply with the regulations of the New York State Insurance Department concerning the sale of new life insurance policies to replace existing coverage are governed by the three-year Statute of Limitations applicable to actions seeking to recover damages for a liability created by statute (see, CPLR 214; Goldberg v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co., 242 A.D.2d 175, 181; see also, Buccino v. Continental Assur. Co., 578 F. Supp. 1518, 1526). Since this action was commenced more than three years after Northwestern's policy was issued, the plaintiff's causes of action to recover damages for violations of Insurance Law §§ 2123 Ins., 4226 Ins. and 11 N.Y.CRR part 51 are time-barred (see, Goldberg v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co., supra).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., FLORIO, FEUERSTEIN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dolce v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 2000
272 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

computing three-year period of limitations from time policy was issued

Summary of this case from Hoffmann v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
Case details for

Dolce v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH C. DOLCE, ETC., APPELLANT, v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 327

Citing Cases

Plavin v. Grp. Health

GBL and Insurance Law claims have a three-year limitations period. [Gaidon v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,…

Pike v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Their causes of action sounding in breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, and fraudulent…