From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dohaish v. Tooley

U.S.
Oct 4, 1982
459 U.S. 826 (1982)

Summary

concluding that § 1823 [e], as Congress' response to holding in D'Oench, Duhme Co. represents broadening protection for FDIC founded on federal policies of protecting banking system

Summary of this case from OCI Mortgage Corp. v. Marchese

Opinion

No. 81-2109.

October 4, 1982, October TERM, 1982.


C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 670 F. 2d 934.


Summaries of

Dohaish v. Tooley

U.S.
Oct 4, 1982
459 U.S. 826 (1982)

concluding that § 1823 [e], as Congress' response to holding in D'Oench, Duhme Co. represents broadening protection for FDIC founded on federal policies of protecting banking system

Summary of this case from OCI Mortgage Corp. v. Marchese

explaining "purchase and assumption" transaction involving failed banks and creating special federal common law protections for FDIC when acquiring note through this method

Summary of this case from Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Whitlock

applying federal common law

Summary of this case from Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Blue Rock Shopping Ctr.

detailing the procedures involved in a purchase and assumption transaction

Summary of this case from Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Gulf Life Ins Co.

applying federal common law D'Oench Duhme doctrine alongside § 1823(e)

Summary of this case from F.D.I.C v. Gonzalez-Gorrondona

permitting award of punitive damages for claims of unfair competition and copyright infringement

Summary of this case from Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Case details for

Dohaish v. Tooley

Case Details

Full title:DOHAISH v. TOOLEY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 1982

Citations

459 U.S. 826 (1982)

Citing Cases

In re Linen Warehouse, Inc.

The FDIC, therefore, is a transferee of the assets and liabilities of the Bank under section 101(50) of the…

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Wood

Purchase and assumption transactions have been described in more detail elsewhere. See Gunter v. Hutcheson,…