From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doerr v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Jan 27, 2009
NO. 2:07-CV-275 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 2:07-CV-275.

January 27, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to this report.

After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, [Doc. 18], it is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED insofar as it seeks a remand, [Doc. 11], the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant is DENIED, [Doc. 16], and this case is remanded to the defendant Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).


Summaries of

Doerr v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Jan 27, 2009
NO. 2:07-CV-275 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Doerr v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. DOERR v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville

Date published: Jan 27, 2009

Citations

NO. 2:07-CV-275 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Chambers v. Astrue

"However, to establish a severe impairment, a [claimant] must show more than the mere presence of a condition…

Abbott v. Kijakazi

. “[I]f an impairment has ‘more than a minimal effect' on the claimant's ability to do basic work activities,…