From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. S.C. Dep't of Prob., Parole, & Pardon Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Mar 25, 2021
C/A No. 1:21-355-MGL-PJG (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2021)

Opinion

C/A No. 1:21-355-MGL-PJG

03-25-2021

Jane Doe-4, Plaintiff, v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services; George Willie Yeldell; Jerry B. Adger; Ashley Finch, Defendants.


ORDER

The court is concerned that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. See Sossamon v. Texas, 563 U.S. 277, 284 (2011) ("Sovereign immunity principles enforce an important constitutional limitation on the power of the federal courts. For over a century now, this Court has consistently made clear that federal jurisdiction over suits against unconsenting States was not contemplated by the Constitution when establishing the judicial power of the United States.") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Cunningham v. Gen. Dynamics Info. Tech., Inc., 888 F.3d 640, 649 (4th Cir. 2018) ("[S]overeign immunity deprives federal courts of jurisdiction to hear claims, and a court finding that a party is entitled to sovereign immunity must dismiss the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction."); see also Gaskins v. South Carolina, C/A No. 8:15-4456-JMC-JDA, 2016 WL 8677201, at *3 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 2016) (observing that a claim sought to be filed initially in federal court under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act "is not permitted in this federal court because of the Eleventh Amendment"), adopted by 2016 WL 3207855 (D.S.C. June 10, 2016). The parties are therefore directed to file legal memoranda on whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction over those claims. See In re Bulldog Trucking, Inc., 147 F.3d 347, 352 (4th Cir. 1998) (stating that a federal court is required to sua sponte determine if a valid basis for its jurisdiction exists); see also Lovern v. Edwards, 190 F.3d 648, 654 (4th Cir. 1999) (providing that although the absence of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time during the case, determining jurisdiction at the outset of the litigation is the most efficient procedure). The legal memoranda shall be filed on or before April 30, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED. March 25, 2021
Columbia, South Carolina

/s/_________

Paige J. Gossett

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Doe v. S.C. Dep't of Prob., Parole, & Pardon Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Mar 25, 2021
C/A No. 1:21-355-MGL-PJG (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Doe v. S.C. Dep't of Prob., Parole, & Pardon Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Jane Doe-4, Plaintiff, v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2021

Citations

C/A No. 1:21-355-MGL-PJG (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2021)