From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 22, 2006
441 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-15044.

February 22, 2006.

John W. Goemans, Esq., Kamuela, HI, Eric Grant, Esq., Attorney at Law, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Emmett B. Lewis, Miller Chevalier, Chartered Metropolitan Square, Washington, DC, David Schulmeister, Esq., Cades, Schutte, Fleming and Wright, Honolulu, HI, Kathleen M. Sullivan, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, Jay L. Carlson, Esq., Crystal K. Rose, Esq., Bays, Deaver, Hiatt, Lung Rose, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Clifton is recused.


Summaries of

Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 22, 2006
441 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate

Case Details

Full title:John DOE, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Jane DOE nfr Jane Doe…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 2006

Citations

441 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2006)