From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 22, 2014
497 Mich. 882 (Mich. 2014)

Opinion

Docket No. 149853. COA No. 321850.

10-22-2014

John DOE 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, and John Doe 7, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor of the State of Michigan, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Chief Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Warden of Carson City Correctional Facility, Warden of Charles Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, Warden of Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Warden of Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Warden of Marquette Branch Prison, and Warden of Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility, Defendants–Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to waive the requirements of MCR 7.209(A) and for stay are DENIED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 22, 2014
497 Mich. 882 (Mich. 2014)
Case details for

Doe v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:John DOE 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

497 Mich. 882 (Mich. 2014)
854 N.W.2d 718

Citing Cases

O'Halloran v. Sec'y of State

And, since the AFT Mich order was entered, this Court has denied at least two other requests to waive the…

Doe v. Dep't of Corr.

This Court denied leave in both applications, but our Supreme Court remanded for consideration as on leave…