From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodson v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 5, 1952
92 A.2d 754 (Md. 1952)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 20, October Term, 1952.]

Decided December 5, 1952.

HABEAS CORPUS — Unlawful Search and Seizure Without Warrant. An alleged unlawful search and seizure without a warrant does not entitle a petitioner to be released on habeas corpus. p. 656

Decided December 5, 1952.

Habeas corpus proceeding by Earl Dodson against Warden of Maryland House of Correction. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before MARKELL, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS and HENDERSON, JJ.


Earl Dodson, who was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on the charge of robbery with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to the Maryland House of Correction for four years, is applying here for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

He alleges that the police searched his home without a warrant and also searched him and took his watch and money from him and used them as evidence against him. He contends that he was convicted on evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure.

The alleged unlawful search and seizure without a warrant would not entitle petitioner to be released on habeas corpus. State ex rel. Cullings v. Warden of Baltimore City Jail, 198 Md. 670, 81 A.2d 645; Bowen v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 200 Md. 661, 90 A.2d 174; Barr v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 200 Md. 657, 90 A.2d 216.

Application denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Dodson v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 5, 1952
92 A.2d 754 (Md. 1952)
Case details for

Dodson v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:DODSON v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 5, 1952

Citations

92 A.2d 754 (Md. 1952)
92 A.2d 754

Citing Cases

Presley v. Warden

This Court has repeatedly stated that the legality of a search and seizure may be raised on appeal but cannot…

Presley v. Peppersack

"This Court has repeatedly stated that the legality of a search and seizure may be raised on appeal but…