From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodds v. Chicago Transit Authority and Brouilette

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Apr 3, 1956
9 Ill. App. 2d 388 (Ill. App. Ct. 1956)

Summary

In Dodds v. Chicago Transit Authority, 9 Ill. App.2d 388, 132 N.E.2d 816 (1956, abst) a defendant, Brouilette, who was called as an adverse witness by the plaintiff, was asked the following question: "Did you ever admit to anyone that you ran a red light, Mr. Brouilette?

Summary of this case from Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist Body Co., Inc.

Opinion

Gen. No. 46,645. (Abstract of Decision.)

February 21, 1956. Rehearing denied March 20, 1956. Released for publication April 3, 1956.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. JOHN E. PAVLIK, Judge, presiding. Affirmed.

Thomas C. Strachan, Jr., James O. Dwight, Chester A. Wynne, Arthur J. Donovan, and John W. Freels, for Chicago Transit Authority, defendant-appellant;

Clausen, Hirsh Miller, for Richard Brouilette, defendant-separate appellant;

David P. Krasner, for appellee;

Charles T. Shanner, of counsel.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

Dodds v. Chicago Transit Authority and Brouilette

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Apr 3, 1956
9 Ill. App. 2d 388 (Ill. App. Ct. 1956)

In Dodds v. Chicago Transit Authority, 9 Ill. App.2d 388, 132 N.E.2d 816 (1956, abst) a defendant, Brouilette, who was called as an adverse witness by the plaintiff, was asked the following question: "Did you ever admit to anyone that you ran a red light, Mr. Brouilette?

Summary of this case from Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist Body Co., Inc.
Case details for

Dodds v. Chicago Transit Authority and Brouilette

Case Details

Full title:Mattie Dodds, Appellee, v. Chicago Transit Authority, and Richard…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division

Date published: Apr 3, 1956

Citations

9 Ill. App. 2d 388 (Ill. App. Ct. 1956)
132 N.E.2d 816

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Yellow Cab Co.

This is especially true of a public carrier, which owes its passengers the highest degree of care consistent…

Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist Body Co., Inc.

The fact that a different ending appeared on the second question would not have affected the answer of…