From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doctors, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Greater Phila

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 28, 1976
557 F.2d 1001 (3d Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-2166.

Argued April 19, 1976.

Decided April 28, 1976.

John Francis Gough, Michael H. Malin, John M. Fowler, White and Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Miles W. Kirkpatrick, Stephen W. Armstrong, Raymond T. Cullen, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee, Blue Cross of Gr. Philadelphia, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

Henry T. Reath, Jane D. Elliott, Duane, Morris Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee, Hospital Survey Committee, Inc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Before ALDISERT, ADAMS and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

Circuit Judge Adams did not participate in the decision in this case.


OPINION OF THE COURT


After a remand from this Court, see 490 F.2d 48 (3d Cir. 1973), the district court entered summary judgment for the defendants, reasoning that:

The opinion of the district court is reported at 431 F. Supp. 5.

(1) The state action exemption as announced in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 63 S.Ct. 307, 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), was properly invoked;

(2) The statutory exclusion of the "business of insurance" by the terms of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1012 was applicable; and

(3) There was no boycott, coercion or intimidation which would avoid the provisions of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.

We affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis that the facts of this case bring it within the scope of our holding in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania, 481 F.2d 80 (3d Cir. 1973). Thus, we conclude that the "business of insurance" provisions of the McCarran-Ferguson Act remove Blue Cross' conduct here from coverage of the Sherman Act. We agree also with the district court's conclusion that there was no boycott, coercion or intimidation which would affect the applicability of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.

We do not reach the state action issue and intimate no view on whether the holding of Parker v. Brown, supra, governs disposition of this case.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Doctors, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Greater Phila

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 28, 1976
557 F.2d 1001 (3d Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Doctors, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Greater Phila

Case Details

Full title:DOCTORS, INC., A/K/A DOCTORS HOSPITAL, APPELLANT, v. BLUE CROSS OF GREATER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 28, 1976

Citations

557 F.2d 1001 (3d Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Royal Drug Co. v. Group Life Health Ins. Co.

This interpretation, with which we agree was adopted in Doctors, Inc. v. Blue Cross, 431 F. Supp. 5 (E.D.Pa.…

Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus.

ims v. Mack Truck Corp., 488 F. Supp. 592 (E.D.Pa. 1980); Herrin v. L.M. Collins Assoc., Inc., 483 F. Supp.…