From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dock Watch Hollow Quarry Pit, Inc. v. Township of Warren

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 12, 1977
377 A.2d 1201 (N.J. 1977)

Opinion

Argued May 9, 1977 —

Decided September 12, 1977.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Frederick C. Mezey argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Messrs. Mezey and Mezey, attorneys; Mr. Mezey, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Mark L. Antin, on the brief).

Mr. J. Albert Mastro argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Mr. Mastro and Ms. Dolores A. Mastro, on the brief).

Mr. Daniel F. O'Connell argued the cause for cross-respondent ( Messrs. Lanigan and O'Connell, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

Justice Schreiber would affirm the judgment of the trial court as modified by the dissenting opinion of Judge Morgan, reported at 142 N.J. Super. 130.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and HANDLER — 6.

Dissenting — Justice SCHREIBER — 1.


Summaries of

Dock Watch Hollow Quarry Pit, Inc. v. Township of Warren

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 12, 1977
377 A.2d 1201 (N.J. 1977)
Case details for

Dock Watch Hollow Quarry Pit, Inc. v. Township of Warren

Case Details

Full title:DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 12, 1977

Citations

377 A.2d 1201 (N.J. 1977)
377 A.2d 1201

Citing Cases

Quick Chek Food Stores v. Township of Springfield

Thus ordinances restricting hours of particular businesses have been consistently upheld. See, e.g., Dock…

Wayne Tenants Council v. Mayor of Wayne

We do not judge the wisdom thereof, but act only if the presumption of validity is overcome by an affirmative…