From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Djordjevic v. Wickham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 11, 1994
200 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


Except for occasional interruptions of less than two years, defendant doctor treated plaintiff's decedent for chronic cystitis, a condition that can be pre-cancerous, from 1962 to 1989, when primary bladder cancer was diagnosed, and continuing to January 1990, when the last consultation took place. It is evident that this course of treatment was continuous and related to the same original condition or complaint. Commencement of the action within two years and six months of the last date of treatment was therefore timely under the continuous treatment doctrine (see, Massie v. Crawford, 78 N.Y.2d 516, 519).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Djordjevic v. Wickham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 11, 1994
200 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Djordjevic v. Wickham

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE DJORDJEVIC, Respondent, v. ROBERT D. WICKHAM et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 219

Citing Cases

Williams v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N.Y

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.). There is no merit to defendant's contention…

Sinclair v. Cahan

The Statute of Limitations for medical malpractice is 2 1/2 years from the act, omission or failure…