From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 4, 1996
678 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-1207.

September 4, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. G. Robert Barron, Judge.

Appellant pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.


We construe the motion filed by appellant in the trial court as one seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, the motion was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order denying the motion is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 4, 1996
678 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Dixon v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHELTON DIXON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 4, 1996

Citations

678 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

AFFIRMED. See Dixon v. State, 678 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ.,…

Smith v. State

AFFIRMED. See Dixon v. State, 678 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ.,…