From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JJB-RLB

09-03-2013

EDWARD D. DIXON v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated August 8, 2013 (doc. no. 12) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, because all the named defendants are diverse from plaintiff, the plaintiffs motion to remand (doc. no. 4) is DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 3rd day of September, 2013.

___________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD D. DIXON v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Wiltz v. Walmart Inc.

Further, this Court has held that the unambiguous language of §1441(b)(1) requires the Court to disregard the…

Richardson v. Albertsons Cos.

; Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 2013 WL 4766797, at *2 (M.D. La. Sept. 4, 2013) (court refused to consider…