holding that a district court does not abuse its discretion by denying further discovery if the movant has failed to diligently pursue discovery in the past
Summary of this case from Kasem v. Catholic Health InitiativesNo. 95-1812.
October 7, 1996.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 77 F. 3d 484 (first judgment); 76 F. 3d 114 (second judgment).
holding that a district court does not abuse its discretion by denying further discovery if the movant has failed to diligently pursue discovery in the past
Summary of this case from Kasem v. Catholic Health Initiativesstating that the definition of pollutant is meant to "leave out very little" and discussing the courts' ability in citizen suits to determine whether a particular substance falls within the definition of "pollutant" and citing cases
Summary of this case from United States Public Interest Research Grp. v. Heritage Salmonstating that the definition of pollutant is meant to "leave out very little" and discussing the courts' ability in citizen suits to determine whether a particular substance falls within the definition of "pollutant" and citing cases
Summary of this case from UNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP v. STOLT SEA FARMstating that the definition of pollutant is meant to "leave out very little" and discussing the courts' ability in citizen suits to determine whether a particular substance falls within the definition of "pollutant" and citing cases
Summary of this case from United States Public Interest Research Gp. v. Atlantic SalmonFull title:MASON DIXON LINES, INC. v. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 7, 1996
The lawsuit following the EEOC charge is “limited in scope to claims that are like or reasonably related to…
Kruger v. Cogent Commc'ns, Inc.The lawsuit following the EEOC charge is “limited in scope to claims that are like or reasonably related to…