From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiTomasso v. Loverro, Rubel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 23, 1937
276 N.Y. 551 (N.Y. 1937)

Summary

awarding pro rata recovery to minority stockholder after directors conspired with competition

Summary of this case from In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.

Opinion

Argued October 21, 1937

Decided November 23, 1937

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Jacob Krisel, Herman Mendes and George Lessall for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Walter H. Pollak, Samuel J. Silverman, Leslie Handler and Nathan Friedman for defendants, respondents and appellants.

Frank W. Holmes for defendants, respondents.



On plaintiff's appeal from order granting a new trial as to the defendants Loverro et al., order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff, appellant, on the stipulation, without costs.

On plaintiff's appeal from judgment, judgment affirmed, without costs.

On defendants' appeals, judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. (See 276 N.Y. 610, 681.)

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

DiTomasso v. Loverro, Rubel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 23, 1937
276 N.Y. 551 (N.Y. 1937)

awarding pro rata recovery to minority stockholder after directors conspired with competition

Summary of this case from In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
Case details for

DiTomasso v. Loverro, Rubel

Case Details

Full title:LEO DiTOMASSO, Appellant and Respondent, v. VITO LOVERRO et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 23, 1937

Citations

276 N.Y. 551 (N.Y. 1937)
12 N.E.2d 570

Citing Cases

Sommer v. Kelly Co.

( Darling v. Darling, 241 A.D. 57, affd. 265 N.Y. 650; DiTomasso v. Loverro, 250 A.D. 206, affd. 276 N.Y.…

Samia v. Central Oil Co. of Worcester

Harris v. Rogers, 190 App. Div. (N.Y.) 208, 210-212. DiTomasso v. Loverro, 276 N.Y. 551. Joyce v. Congdon,…