From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

District v. Selectmen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton
Dec 1, 1884
63 N.H. 277 (N.H. 1884)

Opinion

Decided December, 1884.

The proper remedy for an assessment of a school-district tax upon persons Not taxable in the district, is an application made by them for an abatement.

PETITION, entered at the law term, by school-district No. 6 in Orford, against the selectmen of Orford, for a reassessment of a school-district tax, the assessment of which was ordered by a writ of mandamus in School-District v. Carr, ante, p. 201. The complaint is, that some of the persons on whom the defendants made the assessment are not taxable in the district.

Bingham, Mitchells Batchellor, for the plaintiffs.


The appropriate remedy for an assessment of the tax upon persons not taxable in the district is an application made by them for an abatement. Locke v. Pittsfield (ante, p. 122) School-District v. Carr (ante, p. 201, 206).

Petition dismissed.

All concurred.


Summaries of

District v. Selectmen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton
Dec 1, 1884
63 N.H. 277 (N.H. 1884)
Case details for

District v. Selectmen

Case Details

Full title:SCHOOL-DISTRICT v. SELECTMEN

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton

Date published: Dec 1, 1884

Citations

63 N.H. 277 (N.H. 1884)

Citing Cases

Farmington v. Downing

On the appeal a hearing could be had and any error in the assessment corrected. Edes v. Boardman, 58 N.H.…

Boody v. Watson

When a person assessed as a tax-payer of a school-district seeks an abatement, claiming that he has been set…