From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

District of Columbia v. Thompson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 2, 1990
580 A.2d 144 (D.C. 1990)

Opinion

Nos. 86-1051, 86-1681

October 2, 1990, Filed


ORDER

On consideration of appellants' petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc and appellee's petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED by the merits division *that appellants' petition for rehearing is granted. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs on the issues raised in appellants' petition for rehearing on or before October 31, 1990. At the discretion of the court, the Clerk shall schedule these cases for argument after the supplemental briefs are filed with this court. It appearing that no judge of this court has called for a vote on the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied.


Summaries of

District of Columbia v. Thompson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 2, 1990
580 A.2d 144 (D.C. 1990)
Case details for

District of Columbia v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellants, v. Patricia THOMPSON, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1990

Citations

580 A.2d 144 (D.C. 1990)
580 A.2d 582
1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 332

Citing Cases

District of Columbia v. Thompson

Id. at 288, 301. After issuance of our first opinion and order, 580 A.2d 144, the District and Maury…

Brogsdale v. Barry

We note, however, that should any of these claims survive, it is doubtful that they would fare any better…