Summary
concluding that evidence implicating another suspect is admissible only when the defense can establish a clear nexus between the third person and the crime
Summary of this case from State v. GillispieOpinion
1993
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dispositions of Petitions for REVIEW[fn†
The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 1993
123 Wn. 2d 1031 (Wash. 1993)
Summaries of
Dispositions of Petitions for REVIEW[fn†
The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 1993
123 Wn. 2d 1031 (Wash. 1993)
concluding that evidence implicating another suspect is admissible only when the defense can establish a clear nexus between the third person and the crime
Summary of this case from State v. GillispieCase details for
Dispositions of Petitions for REVIEW[fn†
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[fn†
Court:The Supreme Court of Washington
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
123 Wn. 2d 1031 (Wash. 1993)
123 Wash. 2d 1031
Citing Cases
State v. Whittles
As the State correctly points out, current precedent is contrary to Whittles's assertion. In State v. Condon,…
State v. StarbuckEvidence of possible motive alone is insufficient to establish this nexus. State v. Kwan, 174 Wash. 528, 533,…