Summary
reviewing court need not separately address SAG arguments that simply repeat or paraphrase arguments presented in appellate counsel's brief
Summary of this case from State v. MahoneOpinion
2000.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dispositions of Petitions for Review
The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 2000
141 Wn. 2d 1030 (Wash. 2000)
Summaries of
Dispositions of Petitions for Review
The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 2000
141 Wn. 2d 1030 (Wash. 2000)
reviewing court need not separately address SAG arguments that simply repeat or paraphrase arguments presented in appellate counsel's brief
Summary of this case from State v. MahoneCase details for
Dispositions of Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:The Supreme Court of Washington
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Citations
141 Wn. 2d 1030 (Wash. 2000)
141 Wash. 2d 1030
Citing Cases
State v. Lander
Application of the same criminal conduct statute involves both factual determinations and the exercise of…
State v. Divorne`[W]aiver can be found where the alleged error involves an agreement to facts, later disputed, or where the…