From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dispositions of Petitions for Review

The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 2000
141 Wn. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2000)

Summary

holding that mid-level manager at one of Costco's 200 warehouses was not acting as Costco's alter ego and thus liability for mid-level manager's actions cannot be imputed directly to Costco

Summary of this case from Washington v. the Boeing Company

Opinion

2000.


Summaries of

Dispositions of Petitions for Review

The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 2000
141 Wn. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2000)

holding that mid-level manager at one of Costco's 200 warehouses was not acting as Costco's alter ego and thus liability for mid-level manager's actions cannot be imputed directly to Costco

Summary of this case from Washington v. the Boeing Company
Case details for

Dispositions of Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: Jan 1, 2000

Citations

141 Wn. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2000)
141 Wash. 2d 1017

Citing Cases

Washington v. the Boeing Company

Thus, Washington's hostile work environment claim must fail. Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wn. App.…

State v. Vick

But substantial compliance is not a defense to a charge of failure to register as a sex offender. State v.…