From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 1, 2000
563 Pa. 627 (Pa. 2000)

Summary

explaining defendant gave firearm to passenger before exiting his vehicle, and passenger placed firearm in her purse and remained in vehicle; even if defendant had power to access firearm, factfinder could not logically conclude defendant intended to exercise control over firearm where record demonstrated his intent was to relinquish such control; if defendant intended to retain control of firearm, he would have kept it or not placed it under control of third party

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McCoy

Opinion

April/May 2000.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket citation _____________________________ ________ _________ ___________ _____________

Com. v. Eckenrode ............ 3/16/ 1090 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 748 A.2d 768 (1999) Com. v. Fox .................. 4/27/ 790 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 748 A.2d 769 (1999) Com. v. Garfield ............. 5/9/ 906 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 748 A.2d 769 (1999) Com. v. Gernski .............. 3/16/ 0804 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 726 A.2d 410 (1998) Com. v. Graboske ............. 5/11/ 1212 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 748 A.2d 769 (1999) Com. v. Harris ............... 5/10/ 0882 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 748 A.2d 770 (1999) Com. v. Heidler .............. 4/18/ 1133 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 741 A.2d 213 (1999) Com. v. Heikes ............... 3/20/ 1059 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 747 A.2d 412 (1999) Com. v. Jeffries ............. 5/4/ 727 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 747 A.2d 414 (1999) Com. v. Johnston ............. 4/27/ 1168 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 748 A.2d 1251 (1999) Com. v. Junious .............. 5/9/ 0961 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 750 A.2d 370 (1999) Com. v. Keels ................ 4/27/ 888 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 748 A.2d 1251 (1999) Com. v. Madden ............... 4/27/ 020 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 M.D. 750 A.2d 371 (2000) Com. v. Magilton ............. 2/24/ 0798 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 741 A.2d 415 (1999) Com. v. Manning .............. 5/9/ 0693 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 747 A.2d 416 (1999)


Summaries of

Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 1, 2000
563 Pa. 627 (Pa. 2000)

explaining defendant gave firearm to passenger before exiting his vehicle, and passenger placed firearm in her purse and remained in vehicle; even if defendant had power to access firearm, factfinder could not logically conclude defendant intended to exercise control over firearm where record demonstrated his intent was to relinquish such control; if defendant intended to retain control of firearm, he would have kept it or not placed it under control of third party

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McCoy
Case details for

Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEALS

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 1, 2000

Citations

563 Pa. 627 (Pa. 2000)
758 A.2d 659

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. McCoy

These statements, combined with the storage of the contraband at Ms. Wilmore's residence, actually…

Com. v. Battle

Constructive possession has been defined as "conscious dominion," which requires two elements: the power to…