From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1993
152 Ill. 2d 559 (Ill. 1993)

Summary

reciting the rule that an attorney has standing to maintain a claim for attorney fees in a dissolution action because he is a party in interest, but stating that the court need not decide whether, in the usual case, parties may settle the issue of responsibility for attorney fees when they settle their dispute

Summary of this case from Law Offices of Colleen M. McLaughlin v. First Star Fin. Corp.

Opinion

1993.


(75856) Hansen v. Orth No. 1-92-1291, filed 05/27/93 ............................ Denied.

(75875) Hauk v. Reyes No. 3-91-0771, filed 07/13/93 ............................ Denied.

(75545, 75559) Haywood v. Superior Bank FSB No. 1-92-0556, filed 04/16/93 ............................ Denied.

(75792) Heiden v. Ottinger No. 2-92-0649, filed 06/11/93 ............................ Denied.

(75656) Heider v. Leewards Creative Crafts, Inc. Nos. 2-92-0812, 2-92-1002, filed 05/14/93 ................ Denied.

(75538, 75542) Hess v. I.R.E. Real Estate Income Fund, Ltd. Nos. 1-90-0107, 1-90-0177, 1-90-0178, 1-90-0179, 1-90-0180, 1-90-0181, 1-90-0182, 1-90-0183, 1-90-0184, 1-90-0185, 1-90-0373, 1-90-0374, filed 02/26/93 ................................ Denied.

(75947) Holstein v. Grossman No. 1-90-3470, filed 07/06/93 ............................ Denied.

(75984) Holston v. Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis 247 Ill. App.3d 985 ..................................... Allowed.

(75392) Hooks v. Liquid Carbonic Corp. Rule 23 Order No. 1-91-3420, filed 03/16/93 .............. Denied.

(75963) Hosselton v. Baby's Room, Inc. Rule 23 Order No. 3-92-0830, filed 08/05/93 .............. Denied.

(75715) Hosselton v. K's Merchandise Mart, Inc. Rule 23 Order No. 3-92-0739, filed 05/04/93 .............. Denied.

(75449) Illinois Graphics Co. v. Nickum 240 Ill. App.3d 981 ..................................... Allowed.

(75560) Illinois Power Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n No. 3-92-0284, filed 04/22/93 ............................ Denied.

(75802) Indiana Insurance Co. v. Hydra Corp. No. 2-92-1197, filed 06/11/93 ............................ Denied.

(75782) Industrial Color, Inc. v. CP Inorganics, Inc. No. 3-92-0605, filed 04/30/93 ............................ Denied.

(75756) In re Annexation of Certain Territory to the Village of Chatham No. 4-92-0490, filed 06/03/93 ............................ Denied.


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1993
152 Ill. 2d 559 (Ill. 1993)

reciting the rule that an attorney has standing to maintain a claim for attorney fees in a dissolution action because he is a party in interest, but stating that the court need not decide whether, in the usual case, parties may settle the issue of responsibility for attorney fees when they settle their dispute

Summary of this case from Law Offices of Colleen M. McLaughlin v. First Star Fin. Corp.

reciting the rule that an attorney has standing to maintain a claim for attorney fees in a dissolution action because he is a party in interest, but stating that the court need not decide whether, in the usual case, parties may settle the issue of responsibility for attorney fees when they settle their dispute

Summary of this case from McLaughlin v. First Star Fin. Corp.
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 1, 1993

Citations

152 Ill. 2d 559 (Ill. 1993)

Citing Cases

In re Midway Airlines, Inc.

tial element to the transaction between the parties, a statement can only be one of material fact if it "is…

Wm. C. Vick Const. Co. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut.

A common element in the Supreme Court's definition of "accident" is the notion that an accident is…