Summary
holding no plain error where the indictment charged kidnapping by confining, restraining and removing, but the court instructed on kidnapping by confinement, restraint or removal
Summary of this case from State v. OxendineOpinion
2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
352 N.C. 680 (N.C. 2000)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
352 N.C. 680 (N.C. 2000)
holding no plain error where the indictment charged kidnapping by confining, restraining and removing, but the court instructed on kidnapping by confinement, restraint or removal
Summary of this case from State v. Oxendinestating that “[s]tatements that relate factual events, where those events tend to show the victim's state of mind at the time the statement is made, are not excluded from the coverage of Rule 803 where the facts related serve ... to demonstrate the basis for the [victim's] emotions”
Summary of this case from State v. EvansCase details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Citations
352 N.C. 680 (N.C. 2000)
Citing Cases
State v. Willoughby
denied, 352 N.C. 680, 545 S.E.2d 723…
State v. WigginsId. "An instruction on diminished capacity is warranted where the evidence of defendant's mental condition is…